Intelligence thinks. Intuition decides.
Psychologists describe two ways of thinking.1,2 System 1 is fast and automatic: you recognize a face, read a road sign, know a link looks wrong. System 2 is slow and careful: you check a contract, work out a sum, weigh a hard case. Most decisions are System 1. System 2 steps in when something needs thought.
A maze becomes a reflex.
A maze is a chain of small decisions: left or right, at every turn. System 1 takes each turn as it comes. System 2 stops and works each one out. Both get through. For the thousands of everyday decisions your systems make, the reflex is what you want, as long as it says when a turn is hard.
System 1
VAKYN
takes each turn at a glance
System 2
an LLM
stops to think at every turn
VAKYN is System 1 for your systems.
It decides the everyday cases in milliseconds and says how sure it is. The unsure ones go to System 2, an LLM or a person.
Expert intuition becomes reliable through practice and feedback in a familiar setting.3 The VAKYN loop is that practice and feedback, for your work: we find where VAKYN gets your cases wrong, train exactly there, and check again, on demand.
Intelligence thinks. Intuition decides.
System 1
VAKYN
- fast
- automatic
- everyday decisions
- says how sure it is
Most cases
Which team should get this ticket?
billing · 97% sureyour code routes it
System 2
an LLM or a person
- slow
- careful
- complex decisions
- thinks it through
The unsure ones
Does this CV show Kubernetes experience?
unclear · 58% surea person checks
The VAKYN loop · practice and feedback
- 01System 2 decides the unsure cases
- 02we find where VAKYN gets your cases wrong
- 03train exactly there
- 04check again, on demand
The VAKYN loop is that practice and feedback, for your work.
One request. Three steps.
You send a state and typed questions about it. VAKYN sends back one answer per question, with how sure it is. Your code turns that into a decision.
{ "model": "jev-latest", "state": "I was charged twice for my March invoice."}The same flow on a real document, with real answers: the worked example.
How you ask it
You give VAKYN a statestateThe thing you want judged: a ticket, a certificate, a CV, a post. Text or JSON, read once per request. and questions with fixed answers: yes or no, pick one, give a score. In the API these are noulnoulA yes-or-no question. Returns the probability of yes, one number from 0 to 1., choicechoicePick one of a few named options. Returns the pick, a probability for each option and a confidence. and scorescorePlace the state on an ordered scale. Returns the expected level, a probability for each level and a confidence.. Start from what you want to know. The type decides the shape of the answer. Ask as many questions as you need in one request, of any type.
What are you asking VAKYN?
noul
Yes or no?
- Use for
- A fact or a rule that is either true or false about the state.
- Example
- “Is this product review fake?”
- Returns
- The probability of yes, one number from 0 to 1.
choice
Which one?
- Use for
- Picking one of a few named options: an action, a queue, a category.
- Example
- “Approve, flag or reject this expense report?”
- Returns
- The pick, a probability for each option and a confidence.
score
How much? What level?
- Use for
- Placing the state on an ordered scale: risk, urgency, severity.
- Example
- “How risky is this expense report?”
- Returns
- The expected level, a probability for each level and a confidence.
Read once, answer every question.
The state is read once. Each question branches from that reading. A small head scores the options, and each answer is calibrated, so ten questions about one document cost little more than one. No text is generated, so there is nothing to parse.
State
Read once
The model reads the state one time and keeps that reading in a cache.
cache
- fake noulHead: scores yes and noCalibrated: for noul, 2 optionsyes 0.04
- topic choiceHead: scores 5 topicsCalibrated: for choice, 5 optionsquality · 0.97
- negative scoreHead: scores 5 levelsCalibrated: for score, 5 levels3.94 of 4
Each question continues from the cached state, so only its own words are read.
Notes
- 1System 1 and System 2 were named by Keith Stanovich and Richard West: Individual differences in reasoning, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23(5), 2000. ↩
- 2And made famous by Daniel Kahneman, Thinking, Fast and Slow, Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2011. The two systems are a way to describe two modes of thinking, not two parts of the brain. ↩
- 3When intuition can be trusted: Daniel Kahneman and Gary Klein, Conditions for intuitive expertise: a failure to disagree, American Psychologist 64(6), 2009. ↩